Trolling Trump: President-Elect Sends Sarcastic ‘Season’s Greetings’ to Those on His Naugh...
What the Puck? Trump Suggests NHL Superstar Wayne Gretzky Replace Justin Trudeau
Church of England Warns Clergy About Christmas Carols With 'Problematic Words'
Matt Yglesias: Why Aren't Conservatives Bothered by Crime in Conservative States?
Taylor Lorenz Extremely Stressed About Getting a Rush Visa ASAP
People Have Fun With Idea That 'Hunnikah' Celebrates a Jewish Gorilla War
Christmas Is a Miracle and You Don't Need to Look Further Than North...
Happy Holidays Tweet from the ATF Doesn't Warm The Heart
If What the Teamsters Prez Told Tucker Carlson Is True It's No Wonder...
Merry Christmas: A Special Bonus Gift of Christmas Funnies Just for You
Simply ‘Wonderful’: Classic Holiday Film Reminds Generations It’s Okay to Cry at Christmas
A Lump of Coal in Her Stocking! Crypto Influencer Gets BURIED for Not...
Political Pivot? Many Question ‘Young Turk’ Cenk Uygur’s Sudden Willingness to Talk with...
'The View' Panelist Says Problem for Dems Is That Gov't Won't Regulate Social...
Man Vs. History: Bear Grylls Gets DROPPED by Community Notes for Awful Take...

Jill Stein's recount effort heads to court (again) after Wisconsin says no to hand-recount request

Jill Stein made it sound so easy — the Green Party’s presidential candidate announced just before Thanksgiving that she’d be filing for recounts in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan as soon as everyone was back in the office after the holiday. All she needed was a couple million dollars to fund the effort, which could theoretically flip any of the three states and thus hand the presidency to Hillary Clinton.

Advertisement

As promised, Stein set the process in motion Friday in Wisconsin. The deadline to request a recount had already passed in Pennsylvania, however, forcing Stein to take the legal route, alleging that the election there was illegal.

Now it seems she’s going to court in Wisconsin as well, after the state said no to her request for a hand-recount of ballots.

The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported Monday that officials in each of Wisconsin’s 72 counties would decide whether to do hand recounts, unless Stein were to prevail in court.

The Washington Examiner added that Stein and independent candidate Rocky De La Fuente would have to come up with $3.5 million by Tuesday afternoon to pay for the Wisconsin recount, which would require the hiring of thousands of temporary workers to meet the Dec. 12 deadline.

Or, Stein could simply accept the results of the election, as Hillary Clinton and so many other warned Donald Trump would not do, thus eroding the country’s trust in the electoral system.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/0Boyd0/status/803396440861147139

https://twitter.com/MDChristman23/status/803393254364430336

She’s always been irrelevant, but obviously she’s not expecting to find enough votes for her to win any of the three states.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement