Trolling Trump: President-Elect Sends Sarcastic ‘Season’s Greetings’ to Those on His Naugh...
What the Puck? Trump Suggests NHL Superstar Wayne Gretzky Replace Justin Trudeau
Church of England Warns Clergy About Christmas Carols With 'Problematic Words'
Matt Yglesias: Why Aren't Conservatives Bothered by Crime in Conservative States?
Taylor Lorenz Extremely Stressed About Getting a Rush Visa ASAP
People Have Fun With Idea That 'Hunnikah' Celebrates a Jewish Gorilla War
Christmas Is a Miracle and You Don't Need to Look Further Than North...
Happy Holidays Tweet from the ATF Doesn't Warm The Heart
If What the Teamsters Prez Told Tucker Carlson Is True It's No Wonder...
Merry Christmas: A Special Bonus Gift of Christmas Funnies Just for You
Simply ‘Wonderful’: Classic Holiday Film Reminds Generations It’s Okay to Cry at Christmas
A Lump of Coal in Her Stocking! Crypto Influencer Gets BURIED for Not...
Political Pivot? Many Question ‘Young Turk’ Cenk Uygur’s Sudden Willingness to Talk with...
'The View' Panelist Says Problem for Dems Is That Gov't Won't Regulate Social...
Man Vs. History: Bear Grylls Gets DROPPED by Community Notes for Awful Take...

Guardian writer: Pro-life messages don't belong on public property

As Twitchy reported earlier today, Planned Parenthood is at last making good on its long-standing threat to file suit against the Center for Medical Progress, which released a series of videos showing Planned Parenthood administrators haggling over the price of organs and abortionists describing in detail their “crunching” techniques for preserving the most desired fetal body parts.

Advertisement

While it looks like the courts will determine if the CMP’s undercover sting of Planned Parenthood violated any laws, NARAL took the unbelievable step today of copying and tweeting this nugget from yesterday’s issue of the Guardian. Obviously the U.S. Constitution states that abortion is a right, but putting up pro-life messages on public property where people might see them? Won’t someone think of these poor clowns? They need to be rested and funny when they reach their stop.

Writer Andy Kopsa’s specific complaint is that pro-choicers “can make up their own facts” but “they ought be limited to spreading that harmful and deadly rhetoric on private property, not public.” Last week, however, the group Louisiana Right To Life set up banners showing a 19-month-old fetus alongside the message, “Give Her a Chance.”

This, she argues, is “a purely religious message” which 1) had to be approved by the city and the department of public works, and 2) hangs from streetlights and other publicly funded infrastructure, which means that taxpayers are being forced to “subsidize a proliferation of anti-abortion rhetoric.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/LetsBanEvrythng/status/687772333365305344

Just because the group is pro-life doesn’t make it a religious entity, though.

Your First Amendment holds no power against the city’s department of public works.

Advertisement

Are you kidding? Imagine if Planned Parenthood received even one taxpayer dime of funding …

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement