J.K. Rowling Helpfully Explains How Women With Penises Are Like Wizards
Kash Patel Needs to Clean House! Check Out What This Former FBI Agent...
WATCH: Former Minnesota DOC Employee SHAMES Democrats for Letting Men Into Women's Prisons
Media Self-Own Alert! Chuck Todd Points Out Which Journalistic Enterprises Are Not to...
'Your Country Is the United States of America!' JD Vance Reminds a Constituent...
Paging Tom Homan! Madison, WI Sheriff Issues Memo Saying His Department Will NOT...
WILDCARD WEDNESDAY: Gold Cards, Joyless Reid, and the Jonas Brothers
Politico Really Hopes the Conservative SCOTUS Justices They Hate Will Rein in Trump's...
After Threatening to Sue Trump Admin, Maine Dems Censure Republican Critic of Gov....
MTG Slams the Door on Moskowitz’s Desperate Democrat Stunt: The Queen of ‘No’...
Adam Schiff Slams Jeff Bezos for Not Burning WaPo to the Ground to...
Oh, Great, Gavin Newsom’s Podcast Is Here to Save Us—Because California’s Totally Fixed...
Jeff Bezos Just Nuked 'The Washington Post,' & Lib Media Is Not Happy...
Actress Michelle Trachtenberg Dead at 39
Eli Lilly Throws $27 Billion at America Because Tariffs Twisted Their Arm and...

Latest 'liberal media conspiracy theory' doesn't quite match definition of theory

Earlier today, Politico’s Glenn Thrush dismissed a series of emails between then-Hillary Clinton aide Philippe Reines and Politico White House correspondent Mike Allen as “tradecraft” and nothing more. For those who missed the story, Gawker had uncovered emails between Reines and Allen negotiating an interview with Chelsea Clinton, with Allen appearing to guarantee Reines that he would produce “totally positive coverage” of his subject in exchange for her availability.

Advertisement

The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza then appeared to back up Thrush, citing a piece by Callum Borchers in the Post today dismissing Gawker’s interpretation of the emails:

One interpretation of Allen’s e-mail to Philippe Reines, the Clinton aide, goes something like this: Hey, I’m looking for just a few minutes with Chelsea during an important time for her mom. This isn’t a probing, “60 Minutes”-style sit-down, so don’t worry about fielding anything out of left field.

Not so bad, right?

But the Republican translation will likely go more like this: What can I do to make Chelsea look good because, as we all know, I and my Web site (and most of the media) live to serve the royal family of the Democratic Party.

That indeed is an alternative interpretation; however, it completely ignores the very cozy relationship between Reines and CNN’s Elisa Labott, documented in detail last night by American Commitment president Phil Kerpen. Emails show Reines “suggesting” pro-Hillary tweets which then appeared nearly verbatim on Labott’s Twitter feed as news items. This coordination happened more than a few times. Just a conspiracy theory?

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/669576368523489280

https://twitter.com/EF517_V2/status/669582816380874754

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/669583592809336832

“Republican White House hopefuls sometimes go looking for bias where it’s not obvious, or nonexistent,” Borchers concludes.”But, in this case, they won’t have to look very hard. This time, Politico made their job easy.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/669580907561529345

https://twitter.com/MoonbatCatnip/status/669583721356328960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement