Wanna See Just How DUMB the Left REALLY Is? Check Out This Obviously...
David Axelrod Not a Fan of Dr. Phil Drawing Extra Attention to Biden...
Let's GOOOOO! Kurt Schlichter's Kick-A*S 'To-Do List' for Pete Hegseth Will TOTALLY Break...
Former Federal Employee Spills ALL THE BEANS on What's REALLY Going on with...
White House Thread Spotlights Some 'Model Citizens' (According to Biden) ICE Has Arrested...
Here We GO! Pete Hegseth Makes EPIC Speech After Arriving at Pentagon and...
WOMP-Womp! NBC Journo Learns the HARD WAY That Bleeding Heart BS Does NOT...
SAVAGE Meme of LOOKS Margaret Brennan Made During JD Vance Interview Shows How...
Snakes in the Grass: The Left Tries to Sabotage Pete Hegseth With Ginned-Up...
With the U.K. Calling for His Head, Elon Musk Offers HILARIOUS New Name...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
X User Loser: Colombia President Reposts His ‘L’ on Social Media and Quickly...
FAFO Diplomacy: Scott Jennings Explains How Colombia F’d Around with Trump and Found...
Large Group Terrorizes Drivers Blocking Streets in Dallas While Demanding Open Border with...
J.B. Pritzker Should Ask Colombia How Opposing Trump's Immigration Policies Worked Out

Latest 'liberal media conspiracy theory' doesn't quite match definition of theory

Earlier today, Politico’s Glenn Thrush dismissed a series of emails between then-Hillary Clinton aide Philippe Reines and Politico White House correspondent Mike Allen as “tradecraft” and nothing more. For those who missed the story, Gawker had uncovered emails between Reines and Allen negotiating an interview with Chelsea Clinton, with Allen appearing to guarantee Reines that he would produce “totally positive coverage” of his subject in exchange for her availability.

Advertisement

The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza then appeared to back up Thrush, citing a piece by Callum Borchers in the Post today dismissing Gawker’s interpretation of the emails:

One interpretation of Allen’s e-mail to Philippe Reines, the Clinton aide, goes something like this: Hey, I’m looking for just a few minutes with Chelsea during an important time for her mom. This isn’t a probing, “60 Minutes”-style sit-down, so don’t worry about fielding anything out of left field.

Not so bad, right?

But the Republican translation will likely go more like this: What can I do to make Chelsea look good because, as we all know, I and my Web site (and most of the media) live to serve the royal family of the Democratic Party.

That indeed is an alternative interpretation; however, it completely ignores the very cozy relationship between Reines and CNN’s Elisa Labott, documented in detail last night by American Commitment president Phil Kerpen. Emails show Reines “suggesting” pro-Hillary tweets which then appeared nearly verbatim on Labott’s Twitter feed as news items. This coordination happened more than a few times. Just a conspiracy theory?

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/669576368523489280

https://twitter.com/EF517_V2/status/669582816380874754

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/669583592809336832

“Republican White House hopefuls sometimes go looking for bias where it’s not obvious, or nonexistent,” Borchers concludes.”But, in this case, they won’t have to look very hard. This time, Politico made their job easy.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/669580907561529345

https://twitter.com/MoonbatCatnip/status/669583721356328960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement