Adam Schiff Slams Jeff Bezos for Not Burning WaPo to the Ground to...
Oh, Great, Gavin Newsom’s Podcast Is Here to Save Us—Because California’s Totally Fixed...
Jeff Bezos Just Nuked 'The Washington Post,' & Lib Media Is Not Happy...
Actress Michelle Trachtenberg Dead at 39
Eli Lilly Throws $27 Billion at America Because Tariffs Twisted Their Arm and...
The MSNBC Purge Continues: Most of Maddow's Staff to Be Let Go (But...
NYC Mayor Adams’ Biblical Meltdown Is Either a God Complex or Political Desperation
There's Some Disagreement With ABC's Climate Correspondent As to 'How Science Is Done'
‘There’s No Bottom for These People:’ Jake Tapper to Release Book on Cover...
Chuck Schumer's 'What a Good Business Operator Would Do' Slam on DOGE Collapses...
Join Us! Here's How YOU Can Help Counter Dem/Media Lies About Trump's Agenda
Brian Stelter Didn't Always Think It Was Wrong to Ask If a Media...
'Mi Amor': Yarden Bibas' Eulogy for His Family Is a Stark Reminder of...
Legacy Media Pushed Fake Anti-DOGE Narrative With Staged Protests at Republican-Led Town H...
Slacker Attacker: Federal Worker Calls into Popular Podcast to Voice Frustration with Lazy...

No, 'sexually sick' Fox News didn't censor Picasso's 'Women of Algiers,' despite backlash from Left; Updated

Picasso’s “Women of Algiers (Version O)” made news earlier this week by selling at auction for a record-breaking $179.4 million, and it continued to make news today on the grounds that the “sexually sick minds” at Fox News had censored the painting in the network’s coverage.

Advertisement

Leading the charge was Jerry Saltz, senior art critic for New York magazine.

Saltz’ tweet inspired pieces like, “This Is What Classic Pieces of Art Would Look Like if the Prudes at Fox Had Their Way” in Mother Jones and a brief article at Daily Kos which incorporated an excerpt from the Sydney Morning Herald referencing Twitter’s #freethenipple hashtag campaign.

Unfortunately, Saltz apparently saw some real censorship on Fox 5, New York City’s network affiliate, and attributed the blurring to all conservatives and to the Fox News Network.

Those “sexually sick” conservatives watching the cable news network and not Channel 5 in New York saw nipples aplenty.

https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/598947495587270656

https://twitter.com/TexasJew/status/598954536326209536

Advertisement

To its credit, Mother Jones appended a correction to its piece noting that “it was a Fox affiliate in New York” that had blurred the Picasso and not Fox News. But Ace asks a good question.

While waiting for an answer, we’ll have to settle for Take 2 from Saltz.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/RodrigoLopez03/status/598964821212733441

https://twitter.com/Warden_AoS/status/598986618985443328

* * *

Update:

Joining Australia’s Sydney Morning Herald in picking up Saltz’s mistaken tweet is the U.K. Independent, which refers consistently and exclusively to Fox News, apparently unaware of the concept of a network affiliate.

Linking to this example of “Saudi-style censorship” is Mona Eltahawy, who proudly spray-painted over anti-jihad posters in the New York subway, explaining that her actions weren’t censorship but rather “freedom of expression on top of freedom of expression.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement