Shock report: George W. Bush's portraits sourced from readily available photographs

What’s so funny? BuzzFeed’s Rosie Gray has stumbled upon some “incredible scoopage” from website Animal New York.

Incredible scoopage from @ANIMALNewYork on George W. Bush sourcing all his paintings from Google’s top search result http://t.co/ks5h3cSwIB

— Brian ? Ries (@moneyries) April 8, 2014

Yes, that’s the incredible scoopage. Animal has uncovered that George W. Bush’s 30 paintings of world leaders were sourced from photographs easily found through a Google search — often, the first photo that popped up.

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/453671930420137984

https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/453672489114402816

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/453672713530667008

@CuffyMeh @redsteeze @RosieGrayEven Dubya can't get these guys to sit. The weakest criticism of Dubya yet and that is saying something.

— Dennis (@spongeworthy2) April 8, 2014

@CuffyMeh @redsteeze @RosieGray Who on earth thought Bush wasn't using source photos? Did they think he called them for a private sitting?

— jon gabriel (@exjon) April 8, 2014

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/453674788515356672

@exjon @CuffyMeh @redsteeze @RosieGray Who the fuck cares??? #nothingburger

— realmyiq2xu2 (@realmyiq2xu2) April 8, 2014

Nothingburger? You clearly don’t understand the extent of the scandal here. Critic, artist and appropriation expert Greg Allen told Animal, “Many photos were taken from the subject’s Wikipedia entry. Bush based his paintings on the literally first-to-surface, easiest-to-find photos of his subjects.”

@CuffyMeh Suppose he could have printed a weblink on the bottom in 2-pt. type like Buzzfeed does. @redsteeze @RosieGray

— jon gabriel (@exjon) April 8, 2014

Recommended

J.K. Rowling Helpfully Explains How Women With Penises Are Like Wizards

Aaron Walker

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/453675059170017280

@redsteeze @CuffyMeh WTF DIEBOLD LOL WUT MY PET GOAT PLASTIC TURKEY HALLIBURTON @RosieGray

— jon gabriel (@exjon) April 8, 2014

Now you’re getting it.

https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/453675568387858432

@exjon @CuffyMeh @redsteeze @RosieGray no he clearly should have painted their likenesses from memory.

— Aaron Gettings (@aarong33) April 8, 2014

https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/453675796084060160

@aarong33 @CuffyMeh @redsteeze I don't think @RosieGray understands how painting works.

— jon gabriel (@exjon) April 8, 2014

@redsteeze @exjon @CuffyMeh Wannabe journalism listicle site mocks wannabe painter? Or something. @RosieGray

— Mike (@ThePantau) April 8, 2014

https://twitter.com/BarefootSnap/status/453676207255846912

Yes, please.