‘Hmmm’: Adam Kinzinger Suspicious There Are No Tariffs on Russia
What a Peach! Watch Unhinged Leftist Crow About 'No FEMA' for Tornado-Impacted Red...
Tim Walz's Magical Media Tour Continues! He Tells MSNBC Voters Regret Electing Trump...
Not Even CLOSE, Bud! The Hill Wants Us to Believe the Pendulum Is...
Only 19% of Baltimore Kids Are Proficient in Math, So the District Spends...
Jamie Raskin Calls Fed. Employees Patriots, Claims They Pass Up MANY Rich Jobs...
U.S. Bans Romantic Relationships Between Gov Workers and Chinese Citizens, Eric Swalwell H...
EPIC Post from GenZ'r Explaining Why He's NOT Worried About His 401K DECIMATES...
Now That the Border Is Secure It's Safe for Dems to Go (Tom...
NBC News Scrapes the Bottom of the Barrel to Get a Nurse's Opinion...
CNN's Abby Phillip Gets Fact Checked to Her Face!
HORSES**T! Stephanie Ruhle Tries Lecturing MAGA About What THEY Voted for but Dean...
Chuck Schumer Triggered By Elon Musk's Spot-On 1-Word Post About Dems Suing to...
Fauci's WIFE? LOL! So... ABOUT Those Higher-Up Firings at NIH, You May Have...
'Keep Yackin' You GRIFTER!' Greg Gutfeld Pulls ZERO Punches Taking Joe Scarborough DOWN...

New Yorker Gets DRAGGED for Idiotic Attack on Defenders of Women's Sports

AP Photo/Darren Abate

Is this supposed to be some sort of 'gotcha' by The New Yorker?

Because this is a terrible attempt, if that's what it is.

Advertisement

Louisa Thomas writes:

There are people who want to “save” women’s sports who don’t like women’s sports. A new study in the Sociology of Sport Journal reviewed survey data collected between 2018-19—before the issue was highly politicized—and found that opposition to transgender participation in sports was correlated with idealized views of female attractiveness and traditional gender norms. The people who were more likely to oppose transgender women competing in women’s sports were the ones who were more likely to denigrate female athletes in the first place.

But there are also people who want to narrowly define women’s sports on a natalist basis who care very much about women’s sports. Some of them are, or were, élite athletes themselves. They see the gains of women’s sports as hard-won and dependent on biological differences—differences that are real, however difficult to define.

This sum's up the Left's mentality perfectly: just because they don't like something, it's okay to damage and undermine it.

This writer doesn't care for the WBNA, but she doesn't want a man to take a woman's spot. It's possible to not be a fan of women's sports and still recognize the inherent injustice that comes with letting boys and men on women's teams.

Advertisement

There was a time the Left wanted robust women's sports programs.

The Left always thinks there are ulterior motives.

A completely reasonable stance that most Americans agree with.

They're basically arguing that if you don't have season tickets to the WNBA, you don't get a say in this. It's the athletic equivalent of 'no uterus, no opinion on abortion.'

LOL. No.

Correct on all points.

Advertisement

That's the level of logic The New Yorker applied here.

Safe bet.

A very isolated bubble.

They're missing the point intentionally.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement