What a Peach! Watch Unhinged Leftist Crow About 'No FEMA' for Tornado-Impacted Red...
Tim Walz's Magical Media Tour Continues! He Tells MSNBC Voters Regret Electing Trump...
Not Even CLOSE, Bud! The Hill Wants Us to Believe the Pendulum Is...
Only 19% of Baltimore Kids Are Proficient in Math, So the District Spends...
Jamie Raskin Calls Fed. Employees Patriots, Claims They Pass Up MANY Rich Jobs...
U.S. Bans Romantic Relationships Between Gov Workers and Chinese Citizens, Eric Swalwell H...
EPIC Post from GenZ'r Explaining Why He's NOT Worried About His 401K DECIMATES...
Now That the Border Is Secure It's Safe for Dems to Go (Tom...
NBC News Scrapes the Bottom of the Barrel to Get a Nurse's Opinion...
CNN's Abby Phillip Gets Fact Checked to Her Face!
HORSES**T! Stephanie Ruhle Tries Lecturing MAGA About What THEY Voted for but Dean...
Chuck Schumer Triggered By Elon Musk's Spot-On 1-Word Post About Dems Suing to...
Fauci's WIFE? LOL! So... ABOUT Those Higher-Up Firings at NIH, You May Have...
'Keep Yackin' You GRIFTER!' Greg Gutfeld Pulls ZERO Punches Taking Joe Scarborough DOWN...
Did the Media/Left Serve Up Takes Like These When the Market Dropped During...

Meta MELTDOWN: Axios Whines About the Need for 'Reality-Checkers' in Wake of Facebook Fact-Check Ouster

imgflip

Poor Axios. They are really, really not doing well after Meta -- the parent company of Facebook and Instagram -- announced it was ended its partnership with third-party fact-checkers. Yesterday, they were in a panic because the change might let people (gasp!) say mean things on social media.

Advertisement

Today, they've ratcheted up the rhetoric:

Reality checkers? 

Okay, challenge accepted, Axios. Define 'woman' for us, please.

Here's what they write:


Fact-checking suddenly looks quaint, inadequate and practically irrelevant.

  • Whole realities — the supposed culprits for the LA inferno, a new MAGA map of the world, a child sex-abuse scandal ("grooming gangs") in Britain — now sweep the internet overnight.
  • We no longer need fact-checkers. We need reality-checkers.

Why it matters: When President-elect Trump takes office 10 days from now, he'll be more impervious than ever to metaphysical truth — long the purview of traditional, rigorous news reporting.


Skeptics and opponents will be left shaping, and reacting to, entire worldviews and narratives that have so much momentum — and such powerful constituencies — that they become the reality that lawmakers, regulators, journalists and citizens will have to contend with.

  • This is uncharted terrain. What's real? What's spin? What's outright misinformation?
  • And who do you trust to make sense of it all? And what if others trust people who are untrustworthy?

There is so much to unpack here, but this writer will try.

Advertisement

For starters, they really don't like not having a stranglehold on every single media outlet. They didn't like it when they lost X, and now they don't like that they won't have undue influence over at Meta.

They also really think only they are the arbiters of truth and that people are too stupid to know what is and isn't reality.

All of this coming from the outlet that pretended Kamala Harris wasn't really the border czar.

Look in the mirror, Axios.

That pesky First Amendment.

They're batting a thousand.

This is all their own doing.

Solid advice.

Advertisement

That's quite the graph, isn't it?

Because the Left don't want people to hear things they disagree with, while they have carte blanche to do what they please, including violence. That's why they classify free speech as 'violence' and their violent actions as 'free speech'.

They're adorable, aren't they?

Let's send some Kleenex to the Axios offices, shall we?

We love to see it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos