Cause and Effect: Canada Ready to Eliminate Tariffs as Long as the US...
College Republicans Table-Flipping Professor Identified and Reported
WATCH: Highlights from Wednesday's Nintendo Direct Showcasing the Switch 2
Charlamagne tha Clod: Radio Host Defends Jasmine Crockett Making Fun of Texas Gov’s...
Georgia Dems Stage Walkout Because They Want Taxpayers to Cover Sex Changes for...
Frank Luntz is Flipping His Wig Over Dem Cory Booker’s 25-Hour ‘History Changing’...
Targeted Tesla Owner Seeks Whopping $1 Million in Lawsuit Against Man Who Allegedly...
Skin Over Skills: Jasmine Crockett Landed a Public Defender Job by Pushing that...
Sen. Cory Booker Explains His Training Regimen to Avoid Bathroom Breaks
WATCH: John Boyega Trashes Star Wars Fans
NPR Interviews ‘Fascism Expert’ Fleeing to Canada Over Trump and DEI
Judge Orders Trump Administration to Restore Legal Aid to Migrant ‘Children’
CNN Scare Quotes: Elon Musk Shocked by Hatred ‘From the Left’
Here Are the Number of Illegals Released Into the US During Biden's First...
Trans Woman Inducted Into National 'Women’s' Hall of Fame
Premium

The Left's Love of Legislating From the Bench Courts Disaster

ImgFlip

Despite the fact Donald Trump is the first presidential candidate, and president, to have supported gay marriage. Unlike Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden -- all of whom were against gay marriage until it became politically advantageous to flip-flop.

The reason is pretty clear: for a while, opposing gay marriage was a view held by a significant portion of the electorate. In 2008, California voters passed Prop. 8 by a solid majority. Prop. 8 defined marriage as between one man, one woman.

But the Left -- those tireless defenders of democracy -- didn't like that. At all. 

Rather than respect the democratic will of the California voters and work to change the hearts and minds of those voters, they took the issue to the courts.

In 2015, they got their way when a more liberal-leaning Supreme Court ruled in favor of gay marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges.

In the decade since that ruling, the make up of the Supreme Court has changed. It now has a 6-3 largely conservative majority.

And the Left is realizing that maybe it was a bad idea to put such big issues in the hands of a body that can have such ideological shifts:

I highly doubt this Supreme Court, even with its conservative majority, would rule to overturn gay marriage.

However, back when the Supreme Court ruled on abortion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Lefties caught onto something Justice Clarence Thomas said in his opinion, and we wrote about it at the time, noting (emphasis original):

Make of all that what you will—but don’t fall for the widespread panic porn about how this decision means other rights, like the Obergefell v. Hodges case enshrining gay marriage nationwide, are on the chopping block next.

It is true that one justice, Clarence Thomas, specifically calls for the legal basis of Obergefell to be revisited. It’s complicated, but it seems likely that Thomas would probably support overturning gay marriage.

But Thomas is alone in this call, not joined by any of the other justices. In fact, several others are quick to distance themselves from this rhetoric.

Thomas is right, but not necessarily for the reason the Left thinks. In October 2020, Thomas and Samuel Alito issued a statement when the Supreme Court decided to let a ruling against Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis to stand (Kim Davis had refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples), and Thomas wrote:

'It would be one thing if recognition for same-sex marriage had been debated and adopted through the democratic process, with the people deciding not to provide statutory protections for religious liberty under state law...But it is quite another when the Court forces that choice upon society through its creation of atextual constitutional rights and its ungenerous interpretation of the Free Exercise Clause, leaving those with religious objections in the lurch.'

I will admit the Left is, by and large, good at playing the political long game. They have their agenda and they tirelessly pursue that agenda until they get their way. 

(The Right could learn a thing or to from them, frankly, but I digress).

They often resort to the courts to legislate that agenda when they're unable to pass it through normal democratic means.

And despite the Left's rabid pursuit of its agenda, it forgets that they won't always control the institutions of power. Democrats won't always hold the White House and both chambers of Congress.

The Supreme Court won't always have a favorable majority.

So when they use the courts to push their ideology, they risk having that ideology undone by a subsequent court.

And -- as CNN demonstrates -- they're only realizing now that this could spell disaster for them and the things they argued are 'rights.'

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement