Slacker Attacker: Federal Worker Calls into Popular Podcast to Voice Frustration with Lazy...
The Scream Team: Does a Dem Ticket of Jasmine Crockett & Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez...
WHCA President Eugene Daniels Out at Politico Plus a Look Back at When...
Despondent Correspondents: Scott Jennings Lays Out Hard Facts for the Depressed Press
Meeting Mayhem: Florida Democrat Maxwell Frost Goes on Name-Calling Tirade Against Trump a...
Drivel War: Backward-Facing Hakeem Jeffries is Looking to the 1800s to Fight Musk...
Michael Moore Says We Could Have Just Deported the Person Who Will Cure...
Still Rules the World: Tears for Fears Celebrates 40th Anniversary of Songs From...
TSA Announces Discontinuation of the CBP One App
ABC News: America's Nation Parks Are in Danger of Falling Into Disrepair
NYT Correspondent Says Trump Reminds Him of Covering the Early Days of Putin
Financial Times: The US Is Now the Enemy of the West
Karoline Leavitt Fires Back at 'New York Times' Writer’s Absurd Tweet
Rachel Zegler Tries to Detox Disney's Poison Apple
BREAKING: Budget Resolution Squeaks Through the House of Representatives in 217 to 215...

Variety Mag Doubles Down, Says We Need MORE Celebrities Lecturing Us on Politics (Good Luck With That!)

Twitter

Kamala Harris spent a lot of money on celebrity endorsements, including a purported $1 million for her sit down with Oprah. She had Beyoncé attend a rally in Houston with the bait-and-switch promise of a show; some 30,000 Beyoncé fans attended and booed Kamala when Queen Bey didn't perform.

Advertisement

It didn't work.

Nothing is more tone deaf than a bunch of rich people who couldn't tell you the price of butter lecturing voters who are choosing between putting food on their tables or keeping the lights on.

It's part of why Kamala lost the popular vote. Rather than distance themselves from celebrity endorsements, however, Variety thinks we need more of it:

They write:

Did you know that Bruce Springsteen and Beyoncé lost the election for Kamala Harris? Or at least bear a large part of the responsibility for her party’s failure at the polls this year? It’s true, you know! — at least if you listen to some of the punditry coming from conservatives, and even from some Democratic operatives eager to find some celebs to push into the middle of their current circular firing squad. Listening to some of these voices, you’d think that Harris could have won six or seven swing states, if only Beyoncé hadn’t shown up to deliver one single four-minute rally speech, or if Taylor Swift hadn’t devoted a singular 300-word Instagram post to a Harris endorsement. Imagine the more favorable electoral counts if only some of the most beloved pop-culture figures in the world had kept their dirty traps shut, right?

You mad, bro? You sound mad.

No, they cannot.

Advertisement

Because they're rich and famous so they must know better than the rest of us.

They sure did.

All of this.

People who make more in one move than most of us will make in our lifetimes can take all the seats.

Bingo.

They will teach political science classes on this.

Advertisement

It's really good to know they're doing well in the Biden economy.

Not one person voted for Kamala Harris because of Taylor Swift.

Not one.

This is also rooted in the Left's insistence that everything be political. Every song, every football game, every movie, every episode of every TV show.

It does not all need to be political.

We won't stop them from making this mistake again.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos