Newsom’s Podcast Ploy: Flattering Charlie Kirk to Fake Normalcy While His Kid Sees...
Professor Implies DOGE Rooting Out Government Waste Is Racist
Cowardly Journalist Who Never Left the Desk Mocks Marine Who Did: A Tale...
Time for a Palate Cleanse! Watch How Adorable Donkey Asks for Hugs From...
Pete Buttigieg Discovers Egg Prices, Pretends He Didn’t Help Scramble the Market
Gov. Kathy Hochul Will Show You What a Real Fight Looks Like If...
Allie Beth Stuckey Exposes Woke Idiots: ‘Trans’ Is Their Slur, Too Stupid to...
Meghan Markle’s Netflix Trainwreck: Pretzel-Shuffling Duchess Out-Fakes Her Own Sob Story
Time to Shop at Target Again? Woke Bishop Calls for Boycott of Retailer...
Brian Tyler Cohen Cites Rolling Stone to Dump on Inspirational Story of DJ...
Corey DeAngelis Reveals School Superintendents' Union Has Come Up With a New Type...
Teachers' Union President Won't Comply With Trump's Fascist Regime
Megyn Kelly Wonders If ABC News Jobs Would've Been Spared Had George Stephanopoulos...
President Trump Calls for MSNBC to Force Nicolle Wallace and Rachel Maddow to...
Get Out the Tiny Violins: Hunter Biden Cannot Pursue Lawsuit Because of His...

LOL WUT?! Missouri Dem STRAIGHT UP Lies About SAVE Act Preventing Married Women From Voting

Twitter

When you have to lie about something, you're losing the argument.

There have been a lot of lies about the SAVE Act -- the legislation that would prevent non-citizens from voting in federal elections -- but this? This one may take the cake:

Advertisement

You'll be totally (not) shocked to learn Jess is a Democrat with Blue Missouri.

She's also a liar.

But here's what The New Republic says:

The SAVE Act is a proposed federal law, so, first off, it would put a future president (say, Trump) in charge of enforcing it, taking that power away from the states. Millions of voter registrations in any states the president decides are problematic could be removed until those voters “cure” their registrations, and state authorities would have no say in it.

And what will the law require citizens who want to vote do? Lacking a passport or other proof of citizenship with their married names, they must produce both a birth certificate (with the seal of the state where it was issued; no copies allowed) and a current form of identification—both with the exact same name on them. That could instantly disqualify about 90 percent of all married women without passports or other proof that matches their birth certificates or proof of a legal name change.

For women in that situation, they can still register to vote if they can prove that they went to court to change their name when they got married, but most women just start using their new married name without ever going through all those formalities (although a few states recognize marriage as a legal name change).

Advertisement

This is all lies.

There's also a simple solution: get a passport or a Real ID.

It's really that simple.

It really is breathtaking in its stupidity.

Apparently not.

If you're this gullible, you shouldn't be allowed to vote, anyway.

It really is.

Absolutely, mind-numbingly stupid.

Advertisement

Real ID is slated to start May 7, 2025. But it's been delayed multiple times and this writer bets you money it'll be delayed again.

It's not, and yet Democrats can't seem to comprehend it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement