While We're Abolishing DEI, Let's Do Away With Helicopter Parenting Other People's Kids,...
Judge Blocks Administration From Revoking Temporary Protected Status of 350,000 Venezuelan...
BREAKING: Republican Randy Fine Wins Florida's 6th Congressional District
Keir Starmer Concerned About Young Boys Being Pulled Into a Whirlpool of Hatred...
WHOOPS: NW Community Bail Fund Helped Free Hate Crime Suspect Who Then Attacked...
Gavin Newsom Woke Up to the Trump Administration Cruelly Freezing CA's Title X...
Politico's Framing of Bondi Seeking Death Penalty for Luigi Mangione Is EXACTLY What...
WATCH LIVE Election Results for Wisconsin and Florida From Twitchy
'McCarthyism' Is the New 'Hitler': Sen. Markey Goes on CNN to Whine About...
Judge Blocks CIA and Office of DNI From Firing Employees Who Worked on...
Canadian Politicians Can Complain About Trump All They Want, but Look at What...
Catherine Herridge and Michael Shellenberger Team Up to Prove the FBI Interfered In...
SELF-INFLICTED: Newsom Blamed 'Price Gouging' for CA's High Gas Prices, but HIS POLICIES...
WATCH: Rep. Jamie Raskin Puts Americans LAST, Demands the Return of Violent Illegal...
Rep. Jim Banks Calls Terminated HHS Worker a 'Clown' Who Deserved to Lose...

LOL WUT?! Missouri Dem STRAIGHT UP Lies About SAVE Act Preventing Married Women From Voting

Twitter

When you have to lie about something, you're losing the argument.

There have been a lot of lies about the SAVE Act -- the legislation that would prevent non-citizens from voting in federal elections -- but this? This one may take the cake:

Advertisement

You'll be totally (not) shocked to learn Jess is a Democrat with Blue Missouri.

She's also a liar.

But here's what The New Republic says:

The SAVE Act is a proposed federal law, so, first off, it would put a future president (say, Trump) in charge of enforcing it, taking that power away from the states. Millions of voter registrations in any states the president decides are problematic could be removed until those voters “cure” their registrations, and state authorities would have no say in it.

And what will the law require citizens who want to vote do? Lacking a passport or other proof of citizenship with their married names, they must produce both a birth certificate (with the seal of the state where it was issued; no copies allowed) and a current form of identification—both with the exact same name on them. That could instantly disqualify about 90 percent of all married women without passports or other proof that matches their birth certificates or proof of a legal name change.

For women in that situation, they can still register to vote if they can prove that they went to court to change their name when they got married, but most women just start using their new married name without ever going through all those formalities (although a few states recognize marriage as a legal name change).

Advertisement

This is all lies.

There's also a simple solution: get a passport or a Real ID.

It's really that simple.

It really is breathtaking in its stupidity.

Apparently not.

If you're this gullible, you shouldn't be allowed to vote, anyway.

It really is.

Absolutely, mind-numbingly stupid.

Advertisement

Real ID is slated to start May 7, 2025. But it's been delayed multiple times and this writer bets you money it'll be delayed again.

It's not, and yet Democrats can't seem to comprehend it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement