OOPSIES! Eric Swalwell Just ACCIDENTALLY Made the Best Case EVER to Confirm Kash...
Chuck Schumer Finds Out the HARD WAY What Happens When You Ask a...
We'd Pay MONEY to See Adam Schiff's Face When He Hears Trump Voicing...
Attn. Pam Bondi! AOC Tells Jon Stewart Insider Trading Is Rampant in Congress
Trump FREES Prolife Activist Bevelyn Williams Biden JAILED for Praying in Front of...
X Deposited a Community Note in Bank of America's Account After Their Response...
Both Stunning AND BRAVE! You Guys Won't Believe It When You SEE What...
Javier Milei Breaks Out VERBAL Chainsaws on WEF Over Trans Indoctrination and DAMN...
Guess What L.A. Officials Were Warned About Before the Fires (So This WASN'T...
OK, What the HECK Is Going on with Barack Obama and Jennifer Aniston?...
Bill Melugin OWNS Lefty Outlets Boo-Hooing Over Illegals With List of Who Trump...
Federal Employees Melting DOWN on Reddit Because Trump Is MAKING Them Go INTO...
Gee, What Happened!? Mass. Governor Has Change of Heart About ICE Arrests &...
Shall Not Be Infringed: Thomas Massie Introduces National Constitutional Carry Act in the...
What a Lovely Crowd ... For Him to POOP ON! Triumph the Insult...

Cue the World's TINIEST VIOLIN: Law Schools Left 'Reeling' After Recent SCOTUS Rulings

Meme

The Left has a very simple standard of operating: the things they like are compulsory, the things they don't like are (or should be) banned. When you realize that's the framework through which they see the world, a lot of what they say and do makes more sense.

Advertisement

This is applies to the law as well. Laws they like -- even if they are bad laws, or laws that overturn decades of legal precedent -- are good laws. Laws they don't like are inherently bad and they lose their minds if they overturn previous rulings.

We see the meltdowns after SCOTUS rules in a way the Left doesn't like.

And now the Hill is reporting that law schools are 'reeling' from recent rulings.

The Hill writes:

The Supreme Court isn’t making it easy to be a law professor these days.  

After overturning the 40-year-old Chevron deference last week, the justices threw law curricula for another major loop on Monday with their earth-shaking ruling on presidential immunity — all this just two years after Roe v. Wade was struck down after 50 years on the books.

Law school professors have been meeting to discuss the forthcoming changes to their courses, trying to get their heads around the new legal landscape the conservative-leaning court is creating. 

“Administrative law goes through some periods where change is glacial, if at all, and other periods when it’s extremely rapid. The period around the New Deal is a very rapid change, the Nixon administration and immediately afterwards was a period of rapid change and this is now a period of very rapid change,” said David Super, a professor at Georgetown Law. “So if you were to compare a syllabus from three years ago, four years ago, with one from next year, I think you’d see not just different cases, but different topics being discussed.”

Advertisement

'The Constitution is a living, breathing document.'

'We can't change the law.'

Pick one, Leftists.

It sure is.

Makes us wonder what exactly they're teaching.

Yep.

Heh.

They're so put out having to do their jobs.

Poor things.

Probably.

So cruel of them.

Advertisement

Total mystery.

Exactly this.

As we said above, the Left loves to argue the Constitution is a living, breathing document. So that means it'll change based on court rulings (using their own logic).

This notion that they can't handle changing what they teach in law school based on big, bad SCOTUS rulings is laughable and gives away the game: the law is static, so long as the Left likes it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos