Oh, So It's TROLLING Now? Vox Tries, Fails to Shift Media Narrative on...
On Their Own: Trump Revokes Taxpayer-Funded Security for Millionaires Dr. Fauci and John...
Nah, We're Good: Hack Don Lemon Thinks Matt Lauer Can Make a Comeback...
Federal Employees Need to GROW UP About Trump's 'Return to Work' Order ......
AP Framing of Target Stores Ending DEI Initiatives Is Why They're Called 'Associated...
'Because It Was Bulls**t': Axios Doesn't Understand How Musk, Tesla Remain 'Bulletproof' F...
Rashida Tlaib Offers 'Solution' to Expensive Grocery Prices That'll Just Make Things Cost...
AOC Better Be Careful Because Jasmine Crockett Is QUICKLY Closing in on Being...
Hot New Media Term for 'Illegal Alien' Just Dropped
Don't Let the Door Hit Ya': Twitter Bids 'Good Riddance' as Norah O'Donnell...
OOPSIES! Eric Swalwell Just ACCIDENTALLY Made the Best Case EVER to Confirm Kash...
Chuck Schumer Finds Out the HARD WAY What Happens When You Ask a...
We'd Pay MONEY to See Adam Schiff's Face When He Hears Trump Voicing...
Attn. Pam Bondi! AOC Tells Jon Stewart Insider Trading Is Rampant in Congress
Trump FREES Prolife Activist Bevelyn Williams Biden JAILED for Praying in Front of...

Elon Musk: Those Who Oppose SAVE Act Are Traitors (Will Saying What Happens to Traitors Earn a Ban on X?)

Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson laid out a plan for the SAVE Act, a set of federal election regulations meant to ensure only American citizens vote.

It's sure to face a challenge in the House, and probably won't make it through the Senate, but X owner Elon Musk had his own thoughts on it:

Advertisement

Ouch.

Probably not.

It's a fair point.

He's certainly made things much more interesting.

Watch the outcry from the Democratic Party on this.

Then ask yourself why.

Yes, we should.

Drop boxes, for example, shouldn't be allowed.

It shouldn't be.

We love the Elmo gif.

Advertisement

And given how inconsistently X enforces its own rules, it'll probably get you a suspension here, too.

Probably will be.

There could be Constitutional grounds about feds imposing rules on state elections, and that could be grounds for reasonable opposition, but securing elections should be a priority.

So spicy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement