Politico: Federal Employees Are Sweating a Trump Comeback
Kamala Harris Tells Charlamagne tha God There's No Question Reparations Have to Be...
'You Have Lost Your Damn Mind' - Harris Campaign's Desperate Play for Black...
NYT: Donald Trump Spreads His Politics of Grievance to Nonwhite Voters
Bret Baier Should Ask Kamala Harris These Three Questions
Dana Loesch Destroys Tim Walz’s Elmer Fudd Hunting Photo Op
Kamala's Husband Offers a Really Strange Glimpse into Their Very Weird Marriage
WATCH: Tim Walz Makes an Absolute KNUCKLEHEAD of Himself Trying to Dunk on...
CNN: Kamala Harris Said She Might Prosecute Oil Companies for Climate Change
Joe Biden's Cognitive Health Is a Beam in the Left's Eye
One Tweet to Rule Them All! Zeek Arkham Destroys the Kamala Harris Agenda...
Golden Arch Rivals: Donald McDonald to One-Up the Kamburglar
Opportunity Economy: Walgreens to Close 1,200 Locations, Saying 25 Percent of Stores Are...
Michigan Senate Candidate Says Gun Violence Is Top Killer of ‘Children Under 21’
Leftists Who HATE 'Mansplaining' Are Very Quiet About Two MEN Facing Off in...

How About NO? CBS Earns MASSIVE Ratio for Saying We Should Swap Foods to Fight Climate Change

Journalism meme

You don't despise the media enough. Not nearly enough. They are a propaganda arm for the Left and the Democratic Party (but we repeat ourselves), and they'll push any agenda they like really, really hard.

Advertisement

They keep trying to make eating bugs a thing, and they keep harassing us over our food choices because eating bugs and veggie lasagna will magically change the climate.

Let's make this clear: anyone that says carbon emissions come from food and agriculture wants you to starve to death. You are the carbon they want to reduce.

CBS writes:

Swapping meat lasagna for vegetarian isn't just healthier for you — it's also healthier for the planet. And a new study shows just how much each swap, like switching beef for chicken in stew, saves greenhouse gas emissions.

Switching food and drink purchases to very similar but more environmentally friendly alternatives could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from household groceries by nearly a quarter, according to the George Institute for Global Health and Imperial College London  study shows in a new study. 

The study released Tuesday aims to show that consumers do not have to make drastic changes — like giving up meat — to make smarter, climate-conscious choices that aggregate to make an impact on carbon reduction, lead author Allison Gaines tells CBS News. 

"But while consumers are increasingly aware of the environmental impact of the food system and willing to make more sustainable food choices, they lack reliable information to identify the more environmentally friendly options," said Gaines, who has a doctorate in public health.

Advertisement

Pardon us while we roll our eyes.

Yep.

And they'll gladly let you starve if they think they're morally superior.

They won't back it up or withdraw it. They'll just keep banging this drum.

Remember: YOU are the carbon they want to reduce.

Oh, this doesn't apply to them, just us.

It'll never end, because they'll keep doing this until they get their way.

We have to keep fighting back.

They're special. Or something.

Advertisement

Yes, there is.

And we all know why.

Nope. Neither are we.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement