Flashback: Here's Nancy Pelosi Singing a (D)ifferent Tune on China, Trade Deficits, and...
‘Hmmm’: Adam Kinzinger Suspicious There Are No Tariffs on Russia
What a Peach! Watch Unhinged Leftist Crow About 'No FEMA' for Tornado-Impacted Red...
Tim Walz's Magical Media Tour Continues! He Tells MSNBC Voters Regret Electing Trump...
Not Even CLOSE, Bud! The Hill Wants Us to Believe the Pendulum Is...
Only 19% of Baltimore Kids Are Proficient in Math, So the District Spends...
Jamie Raskin Calls Fed. Employees Patriots, Claims They Pass Up MANY Rich Jobs...
U.S. Bans Romantic Relationships Between Gov Workers and Chinese Citizens, Eric Swalwell H...
EPIC Post from GenZ'r Explaining Why He's NOT Worried About His 401K DECIMATES...
Now That the Border Is Secure It's Safe for Dems to Go (Tom...
NBC News Scrapes the Bottom of the Barrel to Get a Nurse's Opinion...
CNN's Abby Phillip Gets Fact Checked to Her Face!
HORSES**T! Stephanie Ruhle Tries Lecturing MAGA About What THEY Voted for but Dean...
Chuck Schumer Triggered By Elon Musk's Spot-On 1-Word Post About Dems Suing to...
Fauci's WIFE? LOL! So... ABOUT Those Higher-Up Firings at NIH, You May Have...

What Constitution? See What National Security Advisor Sullivan Says About Warrants for FISA Searches

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution says: 

'The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.'

Advertisement

Pretty clear language, no?

Apparently not for National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan:

First, some background:

Later this afternoon there will be a vote to require warrants to search our communications.

It'll be very interesting to see how this vote goes.

Especially since NSA Sullivan says it's not in our 'national security interests.'

Twitter/X users, on the other hand, are very supportive of such an admendment:

Bury it in bureaucracy. 

Advertisement

It's the American way.

It's right there in black and white.

Yes it is.

Given the breadth of federal law, this gives them carte blanche to get you for breaking a law you didn't even know existed. Data collection should require a warrant and be minimized.

They hate the Constitution, and the rights it protects.

Advertisement

Yes, they do.

No Amendment should be ignored.

It is why the Fourth Amendment exists. To protect us from government overreach like this.

We're sure nothing bad could come of this.

'Because we said so' seems to be their argument here.

Advertisement

This is long overdue.

Exactly.

We can totally trust the government.

We'll update you once the vote takes place.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 50% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement